0.03/0.11	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.03/0.11	% Command    : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM
0.10/0.30	% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
0.10/0.30	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.30	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.30	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.10/0.30	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.10/0.30	% CPULimit   : 1920
0.10/0.30	% WCLimit    : 240
0.10/0.30	% DateTime   : Wed Jul 30 02:03:49 EDT 2025
0.10/0.30	% CPUTime    : 
0.17/0.45	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.17/0.46	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.SZ3s5O68c0/E---3.1_18089.p
0.17/0.47	# Version: 3.0.0-ho
0.17/0.47	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.17/0.47	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.17/0.47	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting new_bool_9 with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting post_as_ho2 with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting full_lambda_10 with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting new_ho_8 with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# new_bool_9 with pid 18235 completed with status 0
0.17/0.47	# Result found by new_bool_9
0.17/0.47	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.17/0.47	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.17/0.47	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting new_bool_9 with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0)
0.17/0.47	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSS32-MSSFFSBN
0.17/0.47	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total)
0.17/0.47	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 130s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# post_as_ho12 with pid 18243 completed with status 0
0.17/0.47	# Result found by post_as_ho12
0.17/0.47	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.17/0.47	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.17/0.47	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting new_bool_9 with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0)
0.17/0.47	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSS32-MSSFFSBN
0.17/0.47	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total)
0.17/0.47	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 130s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.17/0.47	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.17/0.47	
0.17/0.47	# Proof found!
0.17/0.47	# SZS status Theorem
0.17/0.47	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_23, type, cHALF: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_24, type, cDOUBLE: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_25, type, cS: $i > $i).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_26, type, c0: $i).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_27, type, epred1_2: $i > $i > $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_28, type, esk1_3: $i > $i > ($i > $i > $o) > $i).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_29, type, esk2_3: $i > $i > ($i > $i > $o) > $i).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_30, type, esk3_0: $i).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_31, type, esk4_0: $i).
0.17/0.47	thf(cTHM301A, conjecture, (((((cHALF @ c0 @ c0)&![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((cHALF @ (cS @ (cS @ X1)) @ (cS @ X2))<=(cHALF @ X1 @ X2))))&(cHALF @ (cS @ c0) @ c0))&![X3:$i, X4:$i]:((![X5:$i > $i > $o]:(((X5 @ X3 @ X4)<=((X5 @ c0 @ c0)&![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((X5 @ (cS @ X1) @ (cS @ (cS @ X2)))<=(X5 @ X1 @ X2))))))<=>(cDOUBLE @ X3 @ X4))))=>![X3:$i, X4:$i]:(((cDOUBLE @ X3 @ X4)=>(cHALF @ X4 @ X3)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.SZ3s5O68c0/E---3.1_18089.p', cTHM301A)).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((((((cHALF @ c0 @ c0)&![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((cHALF @ X1 @ X2)=>(cHALF @ (cS @ (cS @ X1)) @ (cS @ X2)))))&(cHALF @ (cS @ c0) @ c0))&![X3:$i, X4:$i]:((![X5:$i > $i > $o]:((((X5 @ c0 @ c0)&![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((X5 @ X1 @ X2)=>(X5 @ (cS @ X1) @ (cS @ (cS @ X2))))))=>(X5 @ X3 @ X4)))<=>(cDOUBLE @ X3 @ X4))))=>![X3:$i, X4:$i]:(((cDOUBLE @ X3 @ X4)=>(cHALF @ X4 @ X3))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM301A])])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X15:$i, X16:$i, X17:$i, X18:$i, X20:$i, X21:$i, X22:$i, X23:$i, X24:$i > $i > $o]:((((((cHALF @ c0 @ c0)&(~(cHALF @ X15 @ X16)|(cHALF @ (cS @ (cS @ X15)) @ (cS @ X16))))&(cHALF @ (cS @ c0) @ c0))&(((((epred1_2 @ X17 @ X18 @ c0 @ c0)|(cDOUBLE @ X17 @ X18))&(~(epred1_2 @ X17 @ X18 @ X20 @ X21)|(epred1_2 @ X17 @ X18 @ (cS @ X20) @ (cS @ (cS @ X21)))|(cDOUBLE @ X17 @ X18)))&(~(epred1_2 @ X17 @ X18 @ X17 @ X18)|(cDOUBLE @ X17 @ X18)))&(((X24 @ (esk1_3 @ X22 @ X23 @ X24) @ (esk2_3 @ X22 @ X23 @ X24))|~(X24 @ c0 @ c0)|(X24 @ X22 @ X23)|~(cDOUBLE @ X22 @ X23))&(~(X24 @ (cS @ (esk1_3 @ X22 @ X23 @ X24)) @ (cS @ (cS @ (esk2_3 @ X22 @ X23 @ X24))))|~(X24 @ c0 @ c0)|(X24 @ X22 @ X23)|~(cDOUBLE @ X22 @ X23)))))&((cDOUBLE @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0)&~(cHALF @ esk4_0 @ esk3_0)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])])])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X5:$i > $i > $o, X2:$i]:(((X5 @ X1 @ X2)|~((X5 @ (cS @ (esk1_3 @ X1 @ X2 @ X5)) @ (cS @ (cS @ (esk2_3 @ X1 @ X2 @ X5)))))|~((X5 @ c0 @ c0))|~((cDOUBLE @ X1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, (cDOUBLE @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X5:$i > $i > $o, X2:$i]:(((X5 @ (esk1_3 @ X1 @ X2 @ X5) @ (esk2_3 @ X1 @ X2 @ X5))|(X5 @ X1 @ X2)|~((X5 @ c0 @ c0))|~((cDOUBLE @ X1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X5:$i > $i > $o]:(((X5 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0)|~((X5 @ (cS @ (esk1_3 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 @ X5)) @ (cS @ (cS @ (esk2_3 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 @ X5)))))|~((X5 @ c0 @ c0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((cHALF @ (cS @ (cS @ X1)) @ (cS @ X2))|~((cHALF @ X1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (cHALF @ c0 @ c0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ~((cHALF @ esk4_0 @ esk3_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X5:$i > $i > $o]:(((X5 @ (esk1_3 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 @ X5) @ (esk2_3 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 @ X5))|(X5 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0)|~((X5 @ c0 @ c0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_4])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ~((cHALF @ (esk2_3 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:((cHALF @ Z1 @ Z0)))) @ (esk1_3 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:((cHALF @ Z1 @ Z0)))))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7]), c_0_8])]), c_0_9])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_8]), c_0_9]), c_0_11]), ['proof']).
0.17/0.47	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.17/0.47	# Parsed axioms                        : 5
0.17/0.47	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 4
0.17/0.47	# Initial clauses                      : 10
0.17/0.47	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.17/0.47	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 10
0.17/0.47	# Processed clauses                    : 31
0.17/0.47	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.17/0.47	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.17/0.47	# ...remaining for further processing  : 30
0.17/0.47	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.17/0.47	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.17/0.47	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.17/0.47	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.17/0.47	# Generated clauses                    : 55
0.17/0.47	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 42
0.17/0.47	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.17/0.47	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.17/0.47	# Paramodulations                      : 45
0.17/0.47	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.17/0.47	# NegExts                              : 0
0.17/0.47	# Equation resolutions                 : 4
0.17/0.47	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.17/0.47	# Total rewrite steps                  : 6
0.17/0.47	# ...of those cached                   : 3
0.17/0.47	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.17/0.47	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.17/0.47	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.17/0.47	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.17/0.47	# Current number of processed clauses  : 20
0.17/0.47	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
0.17/0.47	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.17/0.47	#    Negative unit clauses             : 2
0.17/0.47	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 13
0.17/0.47	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 31
0.17/0.47	# ...number of literals in the above   : 82
0.17/0.47	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.17/0.47	# Current number of archived clauses   : 10
0.17/0.47	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5
0.17/0.47	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
0.17/0.47	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.17/0.47	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
0.17/0.47	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.17/0.47	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.17/0.48	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.17/0.48	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.17/0.48	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.17/0.48	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 10055
0.17/0.48	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 375
0.17/0.48	
0.17/0.48	# -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.48	# User time                : 0.003 s
0.17/0.48	# System time              : 0.003 s
0.17/0.48	# Total time               : 0.006 s
0.17/0.48	# Maximum resident set size: 1904 pages
0.17/0.48	
0.17/0.48	# -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.48	# User time                : 0.004 s
0.17/0.48	# System time              : 0.006 s
0.17/0.48	# Total time               : 0.010 s
0.17/0.48	# Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
0.17/0.48	% E exiting
0.17/0.48	% E exiting
0.17/0.48	EOF